Monday, March 5, 2012

Life After Cancer


A guest blog by: Sue Bock

Walking down the dim hallway, I have a light bulb moment; "I don’t need any more answers, I no longer need to research about my breast cancer." At that moment in time my roller coaster of feelings came to a close. Before that, I was always stressed, never comfortable with the uncertainty waiting for the next shoe to drop. I was scared and of course, clinical (since I am an RN after all), researching and searching for answers. Self-care was a big focus for me. I used exercise, yoga, acupressure, and retail therapy with friends to keep me sane. Love was abundant from family and friends. After 3 lumpectomies (because no one ever expected to find any cancer), the specimens were sent for gene testing. All the while, I was hoping, for a positive outcome. After a university tumor board reviewed my results, they agreed unanimously that treatment only by radiation was the best course of action. After I completed my last radiation treatment in January 2011, I celebrated with the therapy team. Then my husband and I drove away to spend a very silly day at the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk playing games. No worries. No thoughts of cancer. 

During treatment one of my radiotherapy technicians told me her own breast cancer story; how she finished 9 months of chemo & radiation and was forced to decide what was next for her. Her increased risk of injury with subsequent increased risk of infection & lymphedema prevented her return to her career as a jewelry designer. This inspired me to take my life coaching in a different direction. Now it is my mission and pleasure to help women after breast cancer to live a life they deserve. It’s about living your best life possible with or without disease. Let me help you find where you fit, maximize your strengths, your impact, and your contentment.

Breast cancer doesn’t define you; it frees you to arrive at different choices.

Sue Bock
Coach Sue


“Inspiring women with courage to dream, change, and live life’s adventure

http://bestlifeafterbreastcancer.com






Friday, March 2, 2012

Deodorant and Cancer


Dear Dr. Bone,

I read that underarm deodorant can cause breast cancer. Is this true?

~Sweaty


Dear Sweaty,

I remember getting an email many years ago about the hazards of deodorant. Actually, it was about antiperspirants, not deodorants.  What is the difference? Deodorants prevent or control odor related to perspiration, whereas antiperspirants work to prevent perspiration in the first place. A major concern about antiperspirants surrounded the aluminum content found in these products. Aluminum was thought to be linked to Alzheimer’s disease. The relationship between aluminum and breast cancer came later and still is hotly debated. Aluminum deposits are found in greater concentration in the areas of the breast where most cancers are diagnosed, and aluminum, like cadmium, has estrogenic-like activity on breast cancer cells.  A further risk involves the ingredients called parabens, which are used throughout the cosmetic industry. When absorbed through the skin sometimes from underarm shaving cuts, these parabens might conceivably accumulate in the fat cells of the breast or in the lymph nodes near the breast.



Despite these associations, there is no definitive study proving that deodorant or antiperspirants cause cancer. However, it makes sense that you should avoid unnecessary exposures that might be related to cancer, even if remotely. I advocate using only deodorants, not antiperspirants. Sweating is a natural mechanism to help us rid our bodies of toxins. Instead of trying to prevent sweating, I prefer to use a deodorant that eliminates odor naturally. The crystals in Naturally Fresh Deodorant products are pure, aluminum-free and paraben-free, and are hypoallergenic.  They are perfect for people working to prevent cancer, for cancer patients, and for cancer survivors.

And, in addition to their original fragrance-free line, Naturally Fresh now has lovely scented products, including lavender, papaya fusion, ocean breeze, and tropical breeze to appeal to men and women everywhere.

~Dr. Bone

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Cancer Quiz


Quiz/statistics/ poverty

Cancer Quiz

1.      What is the most common kind of cancer worldwide?
2.      Which cancer is considered the most curable? 
3.      Which causes more deaths in the United States: cancer or heart attack and stroke?
4.      Which cancers are most preventable?
5.      What percentage of cancer is probably preventable?
6.      What is the biggest risk factor for cancer?

Answers

1.      The most common cancer worldwide is lung cancer, causing over 1.2 million deaths each year. While 85% of the patients with lung cancer are smokers or were smokers, more and more lung cancer is occurring that is unrelated to smoking. In developing countries where smoking is more common and pollution is not as well regulated as in the United States, the incidence of lung cancer is rising.
2.      Many cancers are curable at an early stage. Skin cancers, breast cancer, testicular cancer, and prostate cancer all have excellent prognoses when detected early. Skin cancer is easy to detect and treat if you are having regular skin checks, reputation the reputation of most curable. 
3.      Though they are neck-and-neck, the combination of heart disease and stroke causes more deaths than cancer in the US, according to the Centers for Disease Control.
4.      Lung cancer is highly preventable by avoiding smoking. Having regular colonoscopies should reduce the diagnosis of colon cancer dramatically because precancerous growths can be removed before they turn into cancer. Cervical cancer, a major worldwide risk in developing countries, could be reduced dramatically by the HPV vaccine and by implementation of global screening for this sexually-transmitted virus.
5. A full 30% percent of cancer could be prevented by not smoking, eating fruits and vegetables, and maintaining a normal body weight through regular vigorous physical activity. Unfortunately there are many socioeconomic barriers to attaining these goals.
6. Tobacco smoking is the highest risk for cancer.

These answers may seem obvious, but I was amazed at the number of people who thought that breast cancer was the most common and most deadly worldwide. We take it for granted that people all over the world know the dangers of cigarette-smoking, but data show that people living in other countries are unaware of the health hazards of smoking.

Few people realized how rare some cancers are in the US. For example, there are only about 11,000 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed in the US annually, but this cancer is a leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa. Again, lack of effective public health.


~ Dr. Melanie Bone

Thursday, February 16, 2012

1: 12 Ways To Keep Busy In A Waiting or Treatment Room

Too many of us spend more than half - if not ALL of our days sitting out hospitals or clinics either for ourself, or waiting on a loved one to come out of treatment. It's pretty easy to run out of things to do! Here are a list of 12 ways to never get bored again while you're sitting around. Hey, you may even start to look forward to it!

Way One: Cat's Cradle

Does anyone remember the old game Cat's Cradle? Diane Gershowitz Trivelli does! She commented on our Facebook status and said she always uses this origami with a string, if you will, to help keep her busy in the waiting room. 

A game I personally haven't played in 15 years, here is a way to re-accustom yourself with Cat's Cradle.




Now all you need is the string! I think I used to use a shoe lace. :)

Tomorrow we will post Way Two to keep busy in a waiting/ treatment room.

Lean On Lavender, The Color Of All Cancers,
Arielle

The Truth About Vitamin D



Know your (Vitamin) D- factor

Vitamin D: The “Super-Vitamin”

Vitamin D was once thought to be just another vitamin that was just as important to your health as all the other vitamins.  We know it plays a huge role in the regulation and absorption of Calcium, (that’s why you will see it in your Calcium supplements) but it’s just over the past several years that people are “doing extra D” for important added benefits...and rightly so!

The major biologic function of vitamin D is to maintain normal blood levels of calcium and phosphorus. Vitamin D aids in the absorption of calcium, helping to form and maintain strong bones. Recently, research also suggests vitamin D may provide protection from hypertension (high blood pressure), cancer, and several autoimmune diseases including Multiple Sclerosis, Diabetes, and Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Vitamin D is a somewhat “special” vitamin as well because the body actually manufactures Vitamin D from sunlight.  No other vitamin is produced in our systems.  The fact that our bodies produce it and the fact that it has such an impact on many of our bodies systems, actually puts it in the category of a hormone.  This all important “super-vitamin-y hormone” has made headlines recently because of the link that was discovered with breast cancer.

Vitamin D and Breast Cancer

It was found that a significant number of breast cancer patients, for whatever reason, had very low levels of Vitamin D.  It was suggested that increasing women’s Vitamin D level to “adequate” (35-74 ng/ml in the blood measured as calcifediol or Vitamin D 25-hydroxy) could save 65,000 women from developing breast cancer every year. A study of over 1400 women in the general population showed that over 50% of them had inadequate Vitamin D levels. (myself included)

When I was diagnosed with stage III breast cancer my Vitamin D level was 23 ng/dl! (desirable is considered to be 35 - 74 ng/dl)  A few weeks of high dose vitamin D under a doctor’s supervision, with a daily supplement intake of 4000 mg/day is keeping me in the 50’s. 

Since the breast cancer study, it has been discovered that other cancer patients as well had low Vitamin D levels (but not prostate cancer).  We are learning more and more about vitamin D and the role it plays on your immune system.  Poor immunity is related to your risk of cancer, but also is linked to heart disease, arthritis, diabetes, and Multiple Sclerosis among others.  the reason is the role Vitamin D plays in “apoptosis” or regulating the destruction of unwanted cells.  A lapse in the regulation causes overgrowth.....cancer.

It would make sense, then, to assume that it is vital you know what your Vitamin D levels are and supplement to keep them stable.  This can be done with a simple blood test called “serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D”.  This has become a very routine blood test and it is the only way to know if you are getting enough D.  With repeated tests you can tell what  “your personal” level of supplementation is in order to keep you within range.  The fact that Vitamin manufacturers are now making Vitamin D in 2000 mg sized pills tells you that people are wising up.

D2 vs D3

Vitamin D comes in two forms when buying supplements. Vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol) comes from plant sources, and Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) comes from animal sources.  Your body produces vitamin D3 from sunlight.  The jury is still out on whether Vitamin D2 or D3 is absorbed better. For vegans, obviously the choice is clear.

How do I get enough Vitamin D?

Naturally:  Our skin will produce vitamin D3 by exposing it to sunlight without sunscreen.  5 – 10 minutes a day 3 x week is sufficient to get adequate doses of Vitamin D in your system.  I must warn you of the Skin Cancer Foundation’s recommendations that you don’t go out in the sun without sunscreen.  (They would rather you just take a pill, thank you)



Foods:  It is hard to eat enough foods to get the levels of D you need. Foods contain, or are fortified with, the form D2 or D3. You will find D in eggs, fish and fish oil, fortified dairy products and (dare I say it?) beef liver (ugh) and cheese. Difficult for those on vegan or low fat diets, but many many foods are fortified. (D3 is the usual form in supplements, but not all are Vitamin D3)

Supplements: Here is where it gets tricky…..initially, the RDA (recommended daily allowance) of vitamin D was thought to be 200 UI/day but we now know that this amount just is not enough. The consensus from many sources is that every adult should be taking 2000 IU/day.... especially, the elderly, dark skinned people, those who live in colder climates (don’t get sunlight exposure), over weight (vitamin D is prevented from absorption in overweight persons) and those who have inflammatory bowel disease like Crohn’s that affect absorption.

Toxicity: Initially, there was not enough evidence to put a number on the upper limit for intake of vitamin D. Early studies showed that abnormally high levels of blood calcium were observed in those that took in excess of 50,000 IU /day of vitamin D.  This led the Food and Nutrition Board to establish VERY conservative maximum upper intake levels of 2000 IU/day.
Since 1997, more and more studies have been done that show vitamin D toxicity is very unlikely in healthy people at intake levels lower than 10,000 IU/day. 

Toxicity can further be avoided by taking it in conjunction with Vitamin K. When taken with Vitamin K, vitamin D is less likely to reach toxic levels.  Certain companies are now making Vitamin D with Vitamin K together.  Not much info on this, but I’m told by experts in the field that the data is there, and there will be more supplements that contain a combo of vitamin D and K in the future.

Be careful

Vitamins are not regulated by the FDA and because of that there is no guarantee that because the bottle says “Vitamin D3 1000 IU, that it contains what it states.
Pick a vitamin company that you trust. Look at their philosophy….look at who owns the company…. how long have they been around….any claims about certain products should have data to support it.  Call the company and ask questions.

Vitamins lose their potency so check expiration dates.
Look for a descriptive label…..does the bottle say just “Vitamin D”…..or Vitamin D3?
Look at the fillers….yeasts, preservatives….bulking agents, binding agents, etc….
Do they “do good” for the community?  do they donate a portion to research etc?

Bottom line

Even if you don’t like taking supplements, you may want to consider getting your Vitamin D blood level checked.  Having the right level may do more for your health than you realize.


Author Susan Gonzalez is a registered nurse, breast cancer survivor, and the creator of MOON Organics Inc. MOON organics is committed to providing organic, healthy products while helping those going through treatment for cancer. Please visit MOON-Organics.com for details.

References:
















Monday, February 13, 2012

Meet John Kaplan


Diagnosed at age 49 with a potential deadly form of lymphoma, Pulitzer Prize-winning photojournalist John Kaplan turned the lens on himself and chronicled his experience in a moving and inspiring visual journal.   Not as I Pictured
Friday, March 2 showing at Embassy Suites Hotel  1601 Belvedere Road, West Palm Beach (just West of Australian Avenue)  8:30 PM  $5 suggested donation.
John Kaplan is donating 10,000 copies to those with cancer. (Please share this with others). 


Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Pink Ribbons Inc.

Pink Ribbons Inc., is a documentary that is disparaging of the role corporations and organizations such as Susan G. Komen, play in funding breast cancer research and other operative programs.

Is Susan G. Komen digging a deeper hole? Coincidentally, the film released February 3, 2012 at the Toronto International Film Festival has only fanned the recent wildfire Komen has created for themselves.

Some are now questioning Komen's priorities. Are they more interested in corporate benefits for their partners or "racing for a cure"?

Watch the trailer for Pink Ribbons Inc.



An interview with Pink Ribbons Inc. producer, Ravida Din:


Were you surprised by the recent news [that a Planned Parenthood grant would be defunded]?
I was actually surprised! Our research focused on who gives money and how is it spent. To see a news story about why funding gets pulled and why partnerships are broken is interesting. It helps us give pause to which companies and organizations we are aligned to.
How did you all come to this project in the first place?
It all started seven years ago. I read an interesting article by Barbara Ehrenreich. She gave a very interesting perspective on the breast-cancer culture we've created today; it spoke to me. I started to read a number of articles, and eventually read Samantha King's "Pink Ribbons, Inc," which we based the film on.
What do you hope audiences take away from the film?
We're hitting theaters this weekend in Canada - starting today. I'm curious to get more of the general public response. The response online and at festivals so far is very good.  People are having more conversations about this subject.  People are not looking at the pink ribbon in the same way; we want a new debate around this issue.
What surprised you during the making of the film?
A lot surprised me. I would say that what surprised me was the lack of coordination in all of these agencies looking for a cure. Non-profits, health organizations, and cosmetic companies who get involved, all promising a cure for cancer, they're not working together to get a cure for cancer. There are no standards or questions around accountability. There is very little focus on primary prevention. The prevention work that is done is screening and lifestyle change as prevention, as opposed to investigating what causes is it in the first place.
And what do you think of all of the public response to the recent news?
The conversations are "What's wrong anyway with fundraising... isn't it better than doing nothing?" People that do participate in these events or who run at these events feel that they're doing a good thing. What the film looks at is: That's fine, but we need to dig a little deeper, ask a few questions about where the money is invested and what the outcomes are. What do we do now? The public response to this news is heartening to see. The film deals with complacency. It's important to do something.  If you don't agree with, for instance, manufacturing projects that are linked to the disease, write to companies and ask questions!
What are you hoping to do in the coming months with the film?
I think that "Pink Ribbons, Inc." will give people a larger context around the breast cancer industry -- how it contradicts the message we are sending to the public about the disease.  Simply focusing on awareness isn't enough anymore.
We want to hear your thoughts. Leave us a comment and we will make sure your opinion is heard! You can also email us anytime at info@cancershopusa.com. 
Are you following us? Follow us on Twitter @CancerShop_USA, and Facebook Cancer Shop USA. 
Lean On Lavender, The Color Of All Cancers,
Cancer Shop USA Team